Comparison of time to treatment initiation of specialty medications between an integrated health system specialty pharmacy and external specialty pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: Specialty medications are commonly dispensed through specialty pharmacies equipped to meet unique monitoring and dispensing requirements. Integrated health system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) coordinate with health system providers to deliver specialty medications to patients and ameliorate barriers to care. However, payors may restrict specialty medication fills to specialty pharmacies external to the health system, potentially leading to delayed treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare time to treatment initiation among patients whose specialty medications were transferred to external pharmacies and patients whose medications were filled at an internal HSSP. METHODS: This was a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study examining time to treatment initiation in patients with a specialty medication referral to the University of Kentucky HealthCare Specialty Pharmacy between July 1, 2021, and July 1, 2022. Patients were classified into cohorts by receipt of dispensing services from the internal HSSP or an external specialty pharmacy. Data collected via chart review included insurance type, reason for prescription transfer, dates of service (including prescription order, transfer, and receipt of medication), and whether a prior authorization or clinical intervention was performed. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients requiring a prior authorization or clinical intervention. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess for statistically significant differences in time to treatment initiation between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients with external transfers were identified for inclusion into the study, and after exclusion criteria were applied, 408 external transfer patients were propensity matched 1:1 to 408 patients with internal fills (total n = 816). Time to treatment initiation was significantly longer in the external transfer cohort as compared with the internal fill cohort, (18 days vs 12 days; P < 0.0001). The internal fill cohort had a greater mean days from provider order to the medication being ready to fill compared with the external transfer cohort (10 days vs 6 days; P < 0.0001). The internal fill cohort had fewer mean days from the medication being ready to fill to patient receipt of the medication as compared with the external transfer cohort (2 days vs 12 days; P < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed in the subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Average time to treatment initiation was 6 days shorter for patients whose specialty medications were filled at this HSSP compared with externally transferred patients. Delays in therapy can cause a negative impact on patient care and disease state management, with increased concern for specialty populations. The results of this study highlight the need for continued discussion about policies that limit patient choice to in-network pharmacies.

Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Clinical Biomarker Discovery in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Purpose of Review: Precision treatments to address the multifaceted pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are desperately needed, which has led to the intense study of fluid-based protein biomarkers in TBI. Mass Spectrometry (MS) is increasingly being applied to biomarker discovery and quantification in neurological disease to explore the proteome, allowing for more flexibility in biomarker discovery than commonly encountered antibody-based assays. In this narrative review, we will provide specific examples of how MS technology has advanced translational research in traumatic brain injury (TBI) focusing on clinical studies, and looking ahead to promising emerging applications of MS to the field of Neurocritical Care. Recent Findings: Proteomic biomarker discovery using MS technology in human subjects has included the full range of injury severity in TBI, though critically ill patients can offer more options to biofluids given the need for invasive monitoring. Blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, brain specimens, and cerebral extracellular fluid have all been sources for analysis. Emerging evidence suggests there are distinct proteomic profiles in radiographic TBI subtypes, and that biomarkers may be used to distinguish patients sustaining TBI from healthy controls. Metabolomics may offer a window into the perturbations of ongoing cerebral insults in critically ill patients after severe TBI. Summary: Emerging MS technologies may offer biomarker discovery and validation opportunities not afforded by conventional means due to its ability to handle the complexities associated with the proteome. While MS techniques are relatively early in development in the neurosciences space, the potential applications to TBI and neurocritical care are likely to accelerate in the coming decade.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: an emerging clinical entity in adult, pediatric, and obstetric critical care.

PURPOSE: To describe the signs, symptoms, causative factors, and treatment for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), an emerging clinical neuroradiologic entity which may be encountered by nurse practitioners in almost any clinical setting. DATA SOURCES: Extensive review of worldwide literature, including peer-reviewed medical specialty journals, supplemented by an actual case study. Currently, a paucity of information exists in the nursing literature. CONCLUSIONS: PRES occurs as a result of disordered cerebral circulatory autoregulation and/or endothelial dysfunction, usually as a result of acute, intermittent hypertension. Clinical manifestations include mental status change, headache, visual disturbance, and seizures. Characteristic abnormalities in the posterior cerebral white matter, seen best on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, confirm the presence of the syndrome. PRES has been documented worldwide among a diverse patient population, yet many clinicians are still unfamiliar with this diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: PRES is a clinical-radiographic diagnosis that requires close collaboration between the clinician and interpreting radiologist. Rapid identification and appropriate diagnostics are essential, as prompt treatment usually results in reversal of symptoms; permanent neurologic injury or death can occur with treatment delay.